Wednesday 15 January 2014

Why the suspension and expulsion Law must Change! Akatch Jim, Sch of Law, UoN


Suspensions and expulsions of students in Universities are a common occurrence in Kenya. More common is the political thread and undertone inherent in all these arbitrary decisions. It has been the singular weapon unleashed by the administration of these institutions to curb student activism and direct political activity to their advantage or disadvantage of popular undertakings. The nature of these decisions has been criticized in wide scale by activists, media and even the courts on numerous occasions. But what exactly enables the administration with such ease continually make them? The answer lies in the very rules guiding the discipline of students.
The Rules and Regulations governing the Organization, Conduct and discipline of students (hereinafter referred to as The RRGOCD),currently operational were enacted in 27th November 1987 under the University of Nairobi Act, CAP 210 Laws of Kenya, which mandated the University Council and Senate to legislate the by-law.
It is noteworthy that this time in history is instrumental in Kenya’s political scene as it is the period that Kenyans were engaged in the second liberation-a struggle for multi-partyism and wider democracy, virulently opposed by the then autocratic regime of President Daniel Moi. Such struggle found home especially in institutions of higher learning mainly the University of Nairobi. The Moi dictatorship therefore found it exceptionally important to curb student activism by such reactionary methods that bore The RRGOCD.
The Rules and Regulations that openly bar even the simplest of picketing and absolutely delegitimises peaceful protest were and are an affront to the UN Declaration of Human Rights let alone the Kenyan Constitution.
Subsequent regimes have failed to inspire a change of The RRGOCD mainly as it has over the years served their cruel selfish gains. Pungent tribal politics have found it an effective weapon to shape the political structure of the University and hence the national one. It is for instance laughable that the NARC Government, the most popularly elected government in recent history, after its victory over the decade’s long KANU dictatorship, only gave blanket amnesty to all and sundry that were suspended and expelled on political reasons under the RRGOCD without even proposing a change in the rules themselves. Such hypocrisy has been the bane of our society.
Hundreds of innocent students have had their studies derailed or halted due to the cruelty of these regulations. In fact statistics show that the rules and regulations have served no positive purpose save being applied selectively on innocent comrades.
It is the duty of such tertiary institution to impart higher education on its students, to steadily support and anchor the constitutional right to education, to mould and model personalities into effective persons for the development of society-It is this duty that has historically been hampered by elements in administration who’ve used the RRGOCD to turn the University from such a facility to a 24hour correctional facility.
The university, just like any other society, needs rules to shape and guide the conduct of elements in it for the greater good. Granted. Asked on the importance of Government a Wiseman said that he needs not its help, but needs help against its excesses. The rules that guide the conduct of students shouldn’t be solely directed on political activism but protect the well-being of students and their property. After all, political activism is positive and should be promoted. Just like the examples of Nelson Mandela, George Washington show, it is not activism that destroys the serenity and standing of this society (the University) but unprogressive, corrupt, tribal elements in the administration left unchallenged.

 Akach Jim,
Student of Law& Student Leader, University of Nairobi